Learning objectives
- Describe the indications for total intravenous anesthesia
- Describe the techniques and models used for total intravenous anesthesia
- Describe the advantages, disadvantages, and safety measures for total intravenous anesthesia
Background
- Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is a technique where intravenous agents are used to induce and maintain general anesthesia, avoiding the use of inhalational anesthetics
- Continuous intravenous infusion is commonly done by a target-controlled infusion (TCI) pump, but can also be achieved using intermittent boluses or manual infusion techniques
- TCI allows precise and individualized administration of intravenous anesthetics
- Both hypnosis and analgesia can be achieved using an intravenous technique
- Goals for TIVA: Smooth induction, reliable and titratable maintenance, and rapid emergence
Indications
- Malignant hyperthermia susceptibility
- Long QT syndrome
- History of severe PONV
- Surgery requiring neurophysiological monitoring
- Anesthesia in non-theatre environments
- Transfer of anesthetized patients between different locations
- Sedation in intensive care
- Tubeless ENT procedures and rigid bronchoscopy
- Thoracic surgery
- Intracranial surgery
- Procedures requiring sedation (e.g., endoscopy, cardioversion)
Anesthetic agents
- Propofol is the hypnotic agent of choice for TIVA
- Analgesia can be achieved using short-acting opioids (alfentanil, remifentanil)
Target-controlled infusion (TCI)
- Sophisticated TCI syringe drivers incorporate real-time pharmacokinetic models that deliver the appropriate dose to achieve and maintain the requested target concentration
- The microprocessor within the syringe driver continuously calculates the appropriate infusion rates
- A bolus/elimination/transfer principle is used to maintain an appropriate plasma level of anesthetic agents
- Induction is achieved by a rapid propofol infusion, giving a bolus calculated to achieve the required plasma concentration
- This is followed by a progressively decreasing infusion rate calculated to match the transfer between compartments and elimination of the drug, maintaining the required plasma level
- Once the compartments reach a steady-state concentration, the infusion rate slows to match elimination only
- To increase the target plasma level, the syringe driver delivers an additional bolus to achieve the desired concentration and then maintains a higher infusion rate
- To decrease the target plasma level, the syringe driver stops infusing until the microprocessor calculates that the new target has been achieved, and the new level is maintained
- Modern TCI pumps also have software that allows titrating to effect-site concentration (the concentration in the brain)
- Depth of anesthesia monitoring (e.g., bispectral index) is required, as there is considerable variation in the uptake and effect of anesthetic agents in individual patients
Propofol TCI models
- Propofol TCI allows easy control and rapid change of the target propofol concentration
- Unpremedicated adult patients >55 years: Target propofol concentration 4-8 µg/mL for induction (usually takes 60-120 seconds)
- When co-administering an analgesic, maintenance at 3-6 µg/mL
- Lower target concentrations are used in the elderly population due to the risk of side-effects
- Propofol TCI is not routinely used in children
- Propofol TCI models:
- Marsh
- Calculations based on the assumption that the central compartment volume is proportional to the patient’s weight, ignoring age
- Assumes that the central compartment volume is 19.4 L for an 85 kg patient
- Designed primarily to target plasma concentrations
- Only used for patients >16 years of age
- Schnider
- Requires age, height, and body weight
- Calculates a sex-specific lean body mass and determines the dosages accordingly
- Assumes that the fixed central compartment volume is 4.27 L for an 85 kg patient (4-fold difference with the Marsh model)
- Allows for effect site concentration to be targeted
- More commonly used in the elderly population
- Paedfusor
- Variant of the Marsh model for patients 1-16 years of age
- Uses weight to calculate target plasma concentration and features a nonlinear scaling of central compartment volume as age exceeds 12 years
- Kataria
- Can be used for patients 3-16 years of age with a minimum weight of 15 kg
- Uses weight to calculate target plasma concentration
- Marsh
Other TCI models
- Minto: For remifentanil
- Bergmann: For fentanyl
- Maitre: For alfentanil
- Gepts: For sufentanil
- Eleveld: For propofol & remifentanil
- Domino: For ketamine
- Dick & Hannivoort: For dexmedetomidine
- Greenblatt: For midazolam
Analgesia
- Since propofol has no analgesic properties, TIVA is commonly achieved by combining propofol infusion with a regional block or supplemental opioids
- Supplemental short-acting opioids:
- Remifentanil
- Elimination half-time: 3-10 min
- Does not accumulate in hepatic or renal failure
- Context insensitive: the time required for the drug concentration to fall by 50% is always the same (~3 min), regardless of age, weight, sex, or hepatic or renal function
- Opioid of choice for TIVA for many anesthesiologists
- Can be given using the Minto model (allows easy titration based on patient age, gender weight and height
- Target plasma concentration: 3-8 ng/mL for induction, up to 15 ng/ml in stimulating procedures
- Ensure adequate analgesia after remifentanil has worn off
- Alfentanil
- Short onset time (90 s)
- Given using Maitre model (calculations based on age, gender and weight)
- Sufentanil
- Much more potent than remifentanil
- Longer duration of action
- Tends to accumulate during prolonged infusion
- Two TCI models: Gepts (fixed compartment volume) and Bovill (assumes that the central compartment volume is proportional to body weight)
- Remifentanil
Advantages & disadvantages
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| More predictable onset and stability of maintenance | Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability of response to the injected agent |
| Elimination of volatile anesthetics along with their possible liver and kidney toxicity, potential rise in intracranial pressure, their effect on the uterus, and possible environmental effects | Lack of ability to accurately assess actual blood levels |
| No need for accurately calibrated vaporizers | Variations in the hemodynamic state of the patient |
| Fast recovery with fewer complications, decreased time to discharge | Requirement for dedicated IV access, and risk of disconnection |
| Propofol is a powerful antiemetic | Risk of accidental awareness |
| Avoidance of nitrous oxide with its effect on air emboli and pneumothoraces, bone marrow suppression |
Safety
- Ensure the cannula is visible and accessible at all times and checked regularly to prevent disconnection or tissuing
- Check the pump setup regularly to prevent tubing disconnection, ensure clamps are open/closed accordingly, pump alarms are rectified and no backtracking of drug occurs
- Ensure the drug concentration matches the programmed concentration
- Ensure the correct syringe is placed in the correct syringe driver
- Use anti-reflux and anti-syphon valves with clamps in multilumen tubing for safe delivery
- Use a processed EEG monitor when a neuromuscular blocker is used
Suggested reading
- Nimmo AF, Absalom AR, Bagshaw O, Biswas A, Cook TM, Costello A, et al. Guidelines for the safe practice of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA). Anaesthesia. 2019;74(2):211-24.
- Pollard BJ, Kitchen, G. Handbook of Clinical Anaesthesia. Fourth Edition. CRC Press. 2018. 978-1-4987-6289-2.
- Al-Rifai Z, Mulvey D. (2016). Principles of total intravenous anaesthesia: Basic pharmacokinetics and model descriptions. BJA Educ 16(3): 92–7.
Clinical updates
Deng et al. (BJA, 2024) report in a large multicentre randomised trial of 3083 adults undergoing elective cardiac surgery that propofol-based TIVA was not associated with differences in major in-hospital complications or 30-day mortality compared with volatile anesthesia (33.2% vs 33.8%), with no separation in 6-month or 1-year mortality, ICU/hospital length of stay, or costs. These findings suggest that, despite theoretical cardioprotective advantages of volatiles, contemporary propofol TIVA delivers equivalent short- and long-term clinical outcomes in predominantly low-risk cardiac surgery patients, supporting technique selection based on patient-specific indications rather than expectation of improved hard outcomes.
Bernat et al. (BJA, 2025) report a large multicentre observational study of 35 242 adult general anaesthetics showing that propofol-based TIVA had a substantially lower carbon footprint than even optimised inhalational strategies. However, TIVA was associated with higher plastic waste generation (≈72 g per case) and potential concerns around propofol pollution, highlighting that while TIVA is the lowest-emission GA technique, sustainable practice must balance greenhouse gas reduction against material use and waste management.
Quintão et al (Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, 2026) report that pediatric TIVA is becoming more precise through universal TCI models and EEG-guided dosing, with moderate propofol effect-site concentrations and remifentanil titration improving recovery profiles while reducing dosing errors, particularly in neonates and infants. The review also highlights emerging evidence for remimazolam as a hemodynamically stable alternative to propofol, and shows that propofol-based TIVA reduces emergence delirium, postoperative nausea/vomiting, and perioperative respiratory adverse events while supporting intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring.
- Read more about this study HERE.
Nerve Blocks App
Pain Medicine Assistant App
POCUS App
MSK Knee App
VetRA App
Nerve Block Manual
Regional Anesthesia Updates
Anesthesiology Manual
Anesthesiology Review
Anesthesia Updates 2025
Anesthesia Updates 2026
Pediatric Anesthesia Updates
Airway Management Updates
US Interventional Pain Manual
Pain Medicine Updates
Mastering Difficult IV Access
PACU Nursing Manual
RA Veterinary Manual