- Indications: Shoulder and upper arm surgery, surgery of the clavicle (combined with cervical plexus block)
- Transducer position: Transverse on the neck, 3–4 cm superior to the clavicle, over the external jugular vein
- Goal: Local anesthetic spread around superior and middle trunks of brachial plexus, between the anterior and middle scalene muscles
- Local anesthetic: 7–15 mL
US guidance allows for visualization of the spread of the local anesthetic and additional injections around the brachial plexus if needed to ensure an adequate spread of local anesthetic, improving block success. The ability to visualize local anesthetic spread and to inject multiple aliquots also allows for a reduction in the volume of local anesthetic required to accomplish the block.
The brachial plexus at the interscalene level is seen lateral to the carotid artery and internal jugular vein, between the anterior and middle scalene muscles (Figures 1 and 2).
The prevertebral fascia, superficial cervical plexus, and sternocleidomastoid muscle are seen superficial to the plexus. The transducer is moved in the proximal-distal direction until two or more of the brachial plexus elements are seen in the space between the scalene muscles. Depending on the depth of field selected and the level at which scanning is performed, the first rib and/or the apex of the lung may be seen. The brachial plexus is typically visualized at a depth of 1–3 cm.
The interscalene approach to brachial plexus blockade results in reliable anesthesia of the shoulder and upper arm (Figure 3). The supraclavicular branches of the cervical plexus, supplying the skin over the acromion and clavicle, are also blocked due to the proximal and superficial spread of local anesthetic. The inferior trunk (C8-T1) is usually spared unless the injection occurs at a more distal level of the brachial plexus.
The equipment needed for an interscalene brachial plexus block includes the following:
- Ultrasound machine with a linear transducer (8–14 MHz), sterile sleeve, and gel
- Standard nerve block tray
- A 20-mL syringe containing the local anesthetic
- A 5-cm, 22-gauge, short-bevel, insulated stimulating needle
- Peripheral nerve stimulator
- Opening injection pressure monitoring system
- Sterile gloves
Learn more about Equipment for Peripheral Nerve Blocks
LANDMARKS AND PATIENT POSITIONING
Any position that allows for comfortable placement of the ultrasound transducer and needle advancement is appropriate. The block is typically performed with the patient in a supine, beach chair, or semi-lateral decubitus position, with the patient’s head facing away from the side to be blocked (Figure 4). The latter position may prove more ergonomic, especially during an in-plane approach from the lateral side, in which the needle enters the skin at the posterolateral aspect of the neck. A slight elevation of the head of the bed is often more comfortable for the patient and allows for better drainage and less prominence of the neck veins. The patient should be asked to reach for the ipsilateral knee in order to lower the shoulder and provide more space for the block performance.
Knowledge of the underlying anatomy and the position of the brachial plexus is important to facilitate recognition of the ultrasound anatomy. Scanning usually begins just below the level of the cricoid cartilage and medial to the sternocleidomastoid muscle with the goal of identifying the carotid artery.
The goal of this block is to place the needle in the tissue space between the anterior and middle scalene muscles and inject local anesthetic until the spread around the brachial plexus is documented by ultrasound. The volume of the local anesthetic and the number of needle insertions are determined during the procedure and depending on the adequacy of the observed spread of local anesthetic.
With the patient in the proper position, the skin is disinfected and the transducer is positioned in the transverse plane to identify the carotid artery (Figure 5-A). Once the artery has been identified, the transducer is moved slightly laterally across the neck. The goal is to identify the anterior and middle scalene muscles and the elements of the brachial plexus that is located between them. It is recommended to use the color Doppler to identify vascular structures and avoid them. The needle is then inserted in-plane toward the brachial plexus, typically in a lateral-to-medial direction (Figure 6), although a medial-to-lateral needle orientation can also be used if there is no room for the former. The needle should always be aimed in between the roots instead of directly at them in order to minimize the risk of accidental nerve injury. As the needle passes through the prevertebral fascia, a certain “pop” is often appreciated. When nerve stimulation is used (0.5 mA, 0.1 msec), the entrance of the needle in the interscalene groove is often associated with a motor response of the shoulder, arm, or forearm as another confirmation of proper needle placement. After careful aspiration to rule out intravascular needle placement, 1–2 mL of local anesthetic is injected to verify proper needle placement (Figure 7-A). It is necessary to ensure that high resistance to injection is absent to decrease the risk of intrafascicular injection. Injection of several milliliters of local anesthetic often displaces the brachial plexus away from the needle. Additional advancement of the needle 1–2 mm toward the brachial plexus may be beneficial to ensure the proper spread of the local anesthetic (Figure 7-B). When injection of the local anesthetic does not appear to result in a spread around the brachial plexus, additional needle repositioning and injections may be necessary.
• When visualization of the brachial plexus between the scalene muscles proves difficult, a “traceback” technique can be used. The transducer is lowered to the supraclavicular fossa. At this position, the brachial plexus is identified posterior and superficial to the subclavian artery (Figure 5-B). From here, the brachial plexus is traced cranially to the desired level.
• It is not necessary to elicit a motor response to nerve stimulation; however, when it occurs at intensities < 0.5 mA, the needle should be slightly withdrawn before injecting as it may be intraneural.
• The neck is a highly vascular area, and care must be exercised to avoid needle placement or injection into the vascular structures. Of particular importance is to avoid the vertebral artery and branches of the thyrocervical trunk: the inferior thyroid artery, suprascapular artery, and transverse cervical artery. Use color Doppler imaging at least once before inserting the needle to locate any vessel that might be in the path of the needle. Anatomical variations are common.
• Never inject against high resistance because such resistance may indicate needle–nerve contact or an intrafascicular injection. A high opening injection pressure (> 15 psi) is always present with needle–root contact. Thus, a seemingly extraneural injection may, in fact, be subepineural. An intraneural injection may spread proximally into the spinal canal.
• One useful maneuver to ensure injection into the proper compartment, after injecting 5–7 mL, is to trace the plexus down to the supraclavicular fossa (while keeping the needle steady to avoid injury). If the injection is performed inside the brachial plexus “sheath,” the correct spread can be seen very clearly (see Figure 8-A). The probe can then be moved back until the needle is visualized in order to complete the injection. If the brachial plexus appears unchanged in the supraclavicular area, one must question whether the injection was done outside the correct compartment (see Figure 8-B).
• The lateral-to-medial insertion is often chosen to prevent injury to the phrenic nerve, which is typically located anteriorly to the anterior scalene, although one should be aware that the dorsal scapular nerve and the long thoracic nerve usually course through the middle scalene and could potentially be injured as well (Figure 9).
• It is common for C6 and C7 to split proximally. It is prudent to avoid injecting between the nerves coming from a single root, as this may result in an intraneural injection. Instead, it is safer to inject between C5 and C6, superficial to C5, or deep to C6 (Figure 10).
• Another relatively common anatomical variation involves the C5 root traveling through the anterior scalene for part of its course (Figure 11). To block this anatomical variant, the root should be traced distally until it enters the interscalene groove.
• Multiple injections are best avoided as they are not usually needed to successfully block the brachial plexus and may carry higher risk of nerve injury.
• In an adult patient, 7–15 mL of local anesthetic is usually adequate for a successful and rapid onset of blockade. Smaller volumes of local anesthetic may also be effective;12,13 however, the rate of success of smaller volumes in everyday clinical practice may be inferior to those reported in meticulously conducted clinical trials.
PHRENIC NERVE BLOCKADE
Phrenic nerve blockade is common following ISB and may compromise respiratory function in patients with pre-existing pulmonary pathology. Four main strategies14 can be used in such patients to provide analgesia after shoulder surgery while avoiding phrenic blockade: (1) decreasing local anesthetic volume; (2) performing the ISB more caudad in the neck, around C7; (3) using a supraclavicular block; and (4) using a suprascapular nerve block (possibly in association with an axillary nerve block). The phrenic nerve lies just superficially to the interscalene groove at the level of the cricoid cartilage and courses caudad and anteriorly and distally along the superficial aspect of the anterior scalene muscle along the neck. The use of a low volume of local anesthetic (eg, 5 mL) reduces the incidence of phrenic nerve blockade but may also reduce the duration of analgesia and possibly decreases the success rate. Higher volumes (10 mL) injected at the level of the cricoid would cause phrenic nerve blockade.
The function of the phrenic nerve can be assessed using ultrasound in M-mode during which a low-frequency curvilinear probe is positioned under the rib cage on the anterior axillary line to evaluate the hemidiaphragm motion (Figure 12). Of note, some authors have recommended using a combination of suprascapular nerve and axillary nerve blockade to provide postoperative analgesia with minimal motor blockade distal to the shoulder with a lower risk of phrenic nerve blockade and other complications of interscalene block. The targeted nerves are small and may prove difficult to find in obese patient. Moreover, these blocks will not provide surgical anesthesia. Another issue that must be considered is persistent phrenic nerve palsy. There is little agreement as to what causes persistent phrenic nerve palsy, but it seems to be at least in part related to inflammation and nerve entrapment rather than direct needle trauma. A contribution of cervical spine disease has been suggested. Other factors may be involved, as most patients in published series have been male, overweight or obese, and middle-aged.
CONTINUOUS ULTRASOUND-GUIDED INTERSCALENE BLOCK
The goal of the continuous interscalene block is to place the catheter in the vicinity of the elements of the brachial plexus between the scalene muscles. The procedure consists of: (1) needle placement; (2) LA injection to assure the proper needle tip position and “open up the space” for catheter (3) catheter advancement; (4) Injection through the catheter while monitoring on US to verify its therapeutic position and (5) securing the catheter. For the first two phases of the procedure, ultrasound can be used to ensure accuracy. The needle is typically inserted in plane from the lateral-to-medial direction and underneath the prevertebral fascia to enter the interscalene space (Figure 13), although other needle orientations, such as out-of-plane or aiming caudad, may also be used. Proper needle placement can also be confirmed by obtaining a motor response of the deltoid muscle, arm, or forearm (0.5 mA, 0.1 msec), at which point 4–5 mL of local anesthetic can be injected. This small dose of local anesthetic serves to ensure adequate distribution of local anesthetic as well as to make the advancement of the catheter more comfortable to the patient. This first phase of the procedure does not significantly differ from the single-injection technique.
The second phase of the procedure involves maintaining the needle in the proper position and inserting the catheter 2–3 cm into the interscalene space within the vicinity of the brachial plexus (Figure 14). Catheter insertion can be accomplished by a single operator or with an assistant. Proper catheter location can be confirmed either by visualizing the course of the catheter or by an injection of local anesthetic through the catheter. When this proves difficult, an alternative is to inject a small amount of air (1 mL) to confirm the catheter tip location. The catheter is secured either by taping to the skin with or without tunneling. Some clinicians prefer one over the other. However, the decision about which method to use can be based on patient age, duration of catheter therapy, and/or anatomy. Tunneling may be preferred in older patients with obesity or sagging skin over the neck or when a longer duration of catheter infusion is expected. Two main disadvantages of tunneling are the risk of catheter dislodgement during tunneling and the potential for scar formation. A number of catheter-securing devices are available to help stabilize the catheter. For additional information see Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks: Local Anesthetic Solutions and Infusion Strategies.
• Both stimulating and nonstimulating catheters can be used. Because motor response on catheter stimulation may be absent even with ideal catheter placement, the use of stimulating catheters may lead to unnecessary needle and catheter manipulation to obtain evoked motor responses.
• The catheter-over-needle technique has recently been reintroduced as an alternative to accomplishing continuous interscalene blockade.
To learn more about the Interscalene Block, see Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block – Landmarks and Nerve Stimulator Technique.
Supplementary video related to this block can be found at Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block and Reverse Anatomy Video.
Learn ultrasound anatomy of Interscalene & Supraclavicular Plexus Block on NYSORA SIMULATORS™.
- Gautier P, Vandepitte C, Ramquet C, DeCoopman M, Xu D, Hadzic A:The minimum effective anesthetic volume of 0.75% ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg 2011;113:951–955.
- Vandepitte C, Gautier P, Xu D, Salviz EA, Hadzic A: Effective volume of
ropivacaine 0.75% through a catheter required for interscalene brachial plexus blockade. Anesthesiology 2013;118:863–867.
- Tsui BC, Lou L: Learning the “traceback” approach for interscalene block. Anaesthesia 2014;69:83–85.
- Muhly WT, Orebaugh SL: Sonoanatomy of the vasculature at the supraclavicular and interscalene regions relevant for brachial plexus block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2011;55:1247–1253.
- Moayeri N, Bigeleisen PE, Groen GJ: Quantitative architecture of the brachial plexus and surrounding compartments, and their possible significance for plexus blocks. Anesthesiology 2008;108:299–304.
- Orebaugh SL, McFadden K, Skorupan H, Bigeleisen PE: Subepineurial injection in ultrasound-guided interscalene needle tip placement. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2010;35:450–454.
- Orebaugh SL, Mukalel JJ, Krediet AC, et al: Brachial plexus root injection in a human cadaver model: injectate distribution and effects on the neuraxis. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2012;37:525–529.
- Hanson NA, Auyong DB: Systematic ultrasound identification of the dorsal scapular and long thoracic nerves during interscalene block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2013;38:54–57.
- Thomas SE, Winchester JB, Hickman G, DeBusk E: A confirmed case of injury to the long thoracic nerve following a posterior approach to an interscalene nerve block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2013;38:370.
- Saporito A: Dorsal scapular nerve injury: a complication of ultrasoundguided
interscalene block. Br J Anaesth 2013;111:840–841.
- Gutton C, Choquet O, Antonini F, Grossi P: Bloc interscalénique échoguidé : variations anatomiques et implication clinique [Ultrasoundguided interscalene block: influence of anatomic variations in clinical practice]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2010;29:770–775.
- Gautier P, Vandepitte C, Ramquet C, DeCoopman M, Xu D, Hadzic A: The minimum effective anesthetic volume of 0.75% ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg 2011;113:951–955.
- Falcão LF, Perez MV, de Castro I, Yamashita AM, Tardelli MA, Amaral JL: Minimum effective volume of 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine in ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block. Br J Anaesth 2013; 110:450–455.
- Verelst P, van Zundert A: Respiratory impact of analgesic strategies for shoulder surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2013;38:50–53.
- Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ: Supraclavicular catheter may be an alternative to interscalene catheter in patients at risk for respiratory failure after major
shoulder surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2013;38:251.
- Kessler J, Schafhalter-Zoppoth I, Gray AT: An ultrasound study of the phrenic nerve in the posterior cervical triangle: implications for the interscalene brachial plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2008;33:545–550.
- Lee JH, Cho SH, Kim SH, et al: Ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided interscalene block: 5 mL provides similar analgesia but less phrenic nerve paralysis than 10 mL. Can J Anaesth 2011;58:1001–1006.
- Smith HM, Duncan CM, Hebl JR: Clinical utility of low-volume ultrasound-guided interscalene blockade: contraindications reconsidered. J Ultrasound Med 2009;28:1251–1258.
- Renes SH, van Geffen GJ, Rettig HC, Gielen MJ, Scheffer GJ: Minimum effective volume of local anesthetic for shoulder analgesia by ultrasound-guided block at root C7 with assessment of pulmonary function. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2010;35:529–534.
- Fredrickson MJ, Abeysekera A, White R: Randomized study of the effect of local anesthetic volume and concentration on the duration of peripheral nerve blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2012;37:495–501.
- Sinha SK, Abrams JH, Barnett JT, et al: Decreasing the local anesthetic volume from 20 to 10 mL for ultrasound-guided interscalene block at the cricoid level does not reduce the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2011;36:17–20.
- Mantuani D, Nagdev A: Sonographic evaluation of a paralyzed hemidiaphragm from ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus nerve block. Am J Emerg Med 2012;30:2099.e5–7.
- Lee SM, Park SE, Nam YS, et al: Analgesic effectiveness of nerve block in shoulder arthroscopy: comparison between interscalene, suprascapular and axillary nerve blocks. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012;20: 2573–2578.
- Pitombo PF, Meira Barros R, Matos MA, Pinheiro Módolo NS: Selective suprascapular and axillary nerve block provides adequate analgesia and minimal motor block. Comparison with interscalene block. Braz J Anesthesiol 2013;63:45–51.
- Lee JJ, Kim DY, Hwang JT, et al: Effect of ultrasonographically guided axillary nerve block combined with suprascapular nerve block in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a randomized controlled trial. Arthroscopy 2014;30:906–914.
- Rothe C, Steen-Hansen C, Lund J, Jenstrup MT, Lange KH: Ultrasound-guided block of the suprascapular nerve—a volunteer study of a new proximal approach. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2014;58:1228–1232.
- Kim YA, Yoon KB, Kwon TD, Kim DH, Yoon DM: Evaluation of anatomic landmarks for axillary nerve block in the quadrilateral space. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2014;58:567–571.
- Kaufman MR, Elkwood AI, Rose MI, et al: Surgical treatment of permanent diaphragm paralysis after interscalene nerve block for shoulder surgery. Anesthesiology 2013;119:484–487.
- Pakala SR, Beckman JD, Lyman S, Zayas VM: Cervical spine disease is a risk factor for persistent phrenic nerve paresis following interscalene nerve block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2013;38:239–242.
- Bellew B, Harrop-Griffiths WA, Bedforth N: Interscalene brachial plexus blocks and phrenic nerve palsy. Anesthesiology 2014;120:1056–1057.
- Birnbaum J, Kip M, Spies CD, et al: The effect of stimulating versus nonstimulating catheters for continuous interscalene plexus blocks in short-term pain management. J Clin Anesth 2007;19:434–439.
- Ip V, Tsui B: The safety of an interscalene catheter-over-needle technique. Anaesthesia 2013;68:774–775.
Single-Injection Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Block
- Albrecht E, Kirkham KR, Taffé P, et al: The maximum effective needle-to-nerve distance for ultrasound-guided interscalene block: an exploratory study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2014;39:56–60.
- Avellanet M, Sala-Blanch X, Rodrigo L, Gonzalez-Viejo MA: Permanent upper trunk plexopathy after interscalene brachial plexus block. J Clin Monit Comput 2016;30:51–54.
- Burckett-St Laurent D, Chan V, Chin KJ: Refining the ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block: the superior trunk approach. Can J Anaesth 2014;61:1098–1102.
- Errando CL, Muñoz-Devesa L, Soldado MA: Bloqueo interescalénico guiado por ecografía en un paciente con alteraciones anatómicas de la region supraclavicular secundarias a radioterapia y cirugía [Ultrasound-guided interscalene block in a patient with supraclavicular anatomical abnormalities due to radiotherapy and surgery]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2011;58:312–314.
- Falcão LF, Perez MV, de Castro I, Yamashita AM, Tardelli MA, Amaral JL: Minimum effective volume of 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine in ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block. Br J Anaesth 2013;110:450–455.
- Fredrickson MJ, Kilfoyle DH: Neurological complication analysis of 1000 ultrasound guided peripheral nerve blocks for elective orthopaedic surgery: a prospective study. Anaesthesia 2009;64:836–844.
- Fritsch G, Hudelmaier M, Danninger T, Brummett C, Bock M, McCoy M: Bilateral loss of neural function after interscalene plexus blockade may be caused by epidural spread of local anesthetics: a cadaveric study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2013;38:64–68.
- Gadsden J, Hadzic A, Gandhi K, et al: The effect of mixing 1.5% mepivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine on duration of analgesia and latency of block onset in ultrasound-guided interscalene block. Anesth Analg 2011;112: 471–476.
- Ihnatsenka B, Boezaart AP: Applied sonoanatomy of the posterior triangle of the neck. Int J Shoulder Surg 2010;4:63–74.
- Koff MD, Cohen JA, McIntyre JJ, Carr CF, Sites BD: Severe brachial plexopathy after an ultrasound-guided single-injection nerve block for total shoulder arthroplasty in a patient with multiple sclerosis. Anesthesiology 2008;108:325–328.
- Lang RS, Kentor ML, Vallejo M, Bigeleisen P, Wisniewski SR, Orebaugh SL:The impact of local anesthetic distribution on block onset in ultrasoundguided interscalene block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012;56:1146–1151.
- Liu SS, Gordon MA, Shaw PM, Wilfred S, Shetty T, Yadeau JT: A prospective clinical registry of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia for ambulatory shoulder surgery. Anesth Analg 2010;111:617–623.
- Liu SS, YaDeau JT, Shaw PM, Wilfred S, Shetty T, Gordon M: Incidence of unintentional intraneural injection and post-operative neurological complications with ultrasound-guided interscalene and supraclavicular nerve blocks. Anaesthesia 2011;66:168–174.
- Lu IC, Hsu HT, Soo LY, et al: Ultrasound examination for the optimal head position for interscalene brachial plexus block. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan 2007;45:73–78.
- Madison SJ, Humsi J, Loland VJ, et al: Ultrasound-guided root/trunk (interscalene) block for hand and forearm anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2013;38:226–232.
- Marhofer P, Harrop-Griffiths W, Willschke H, Kirchmair L: Fifteen years of ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia: part 2—recent developments in block techniques. Br J Anaesth 2010;104:673–683.
- McNaught A, McHardy P, Awad IT: Posterior interscalene block: an ultrasoundguided case series and overview of history, anatomy and techniques. Pain Res Manag 2010;15:219–223.
- McNaught A, Shastri U, Carmichael N, et al: Ultrasound reduces the minimum effective local anaesthetic volume compared with peripheral nerve stimulation for interscalene block. Br J Anaesth 2011;106:124–30.
- Natsis K, Totlis T, Didagelos M, Tsakotos G, Vlassis K, Skandalakis P: Scalenus minimus muscle: overestimated or not? An anatomical study. Am Surg 2013;79:372–374.
- Orebaugh SL, McFadden K, Skorupan H, Bigeleisen PE: Subepineurial injection in ultrasound-guided interscalene needle tip placement. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2010;35:450–454.
- Plante T, Rontes O, Bloc S, Delbos A: Spread of local anesthetic during an ultrasound-guided interscalene block: does the injection site influence diffusion? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2011;55:664–669.
- Renes SH, van Geffen GJ, Rettig HC, Gielen MJ, Scheffer GJ: Minimum effective volume of local anesthetic for shoulder analgesia by ultrasoundguided block at root C7 with assessment of pulmonary function. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2010;35:529–534.
- Roessel T, Wiessner D, Heller AR, Zimmermann T, Koch T, Litz RJ: Highresolution ultrasound-guided high interscalene plexus block for carotid endarterectomy. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2007;32:247–253.
- Soeding P, Eizenberg N: Review article: anatomical considerations for ultrasound guidance for regional anesthesia of the neck and upper limb. Can J Anaesth 2009;56:518–533.
- Spence BC, Beach ML, Gallagher JD, Sites BD: Ultrasound-guided interscalene blocks: understanding where to inject the local anaesthetic. Anaesthesia 2011;66:509–514.
Continuous Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Block
- Antonakakis JG, Sites BD, Shiffrin J: Ultrasound-guided posterior approach for the placement of a continuous interscalene catheter. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009;34:64–68.
Fredrickson MJ, Ball CM, Dalgleish AJ: Analgesic effectiveness of a continuous versus single-injection interscalene block for minor arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2010;35:28–33.
- Fredrickson MJ, Price DJ: Analgesic effectiveness of ropivacaine 0.2% vs 0.4% via an ultrasound-guided C5–6 root/superior trunk perineural ambulatory catheter. Br J Anaesth 2009;103:434–439.
- Fredrickson MJ, Ball CM, Dalgleish AJ: Posterior versus anterolateral approach interscalene catheter placement: a prospective randomized trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2011;36:125–133.
- Fredrickson MJ, Ball CM, Dalgleish AJ, Stewart AW, Short TG: A prospective randomized comparison of ultrasound and neurostimulation as needle end points for interscalene catheter placement. Anesth Analg 2009;108:1695–1700.
- Mariano ER, Afra R, Loland VJ, et al: Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block via an ultrasound-guided posterior approach: a randomized, triplemasked, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg 2009;108:1688–1694.
- Mariano ER, Loland VJ, Ilfeld BM: Interscalene perineural catheter placement using an ultrasound-guided posterior approach. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009;34:60–63.
- Shin HJ, Ahn JH, Jung HI, et al: Feasibility of ultrasound-guided posterior approach for interscalene catheter placement during arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol 2011;61:475–481.