Perioperative blood transfusions and cancer surgery - NYSORA

Explore NYSORA knowledge base for free:

Table of Contents

Contributors

Perioperative blood transfusions and cancer surgery

Perioperative blood transfusions and cancer surgery

Perioperative blood transfusions are often necessary to stabilize patients undergoing major surgery, especially those with cancer. However, a comprehensive new study, The ARCA-1 Trial, published in Anesthesia & Analgesia (April 2025) by Cata et al., raises concerns about their long-term safety. The study presents strong evidence that perioperative transfusion of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) in cancer surgery is linked with increased 1-year mortality and adverse postoperative outcomes.

Study overview: the ARCA-1 trial

The ARCA-1 (Perioperative Care in the Cancer Patient-1) trial is the largest prospective, international, multicenter observational study to date examining the impact of perioperative blood transfusions on outcomes following major cancer surgery.

Study design
  • Type: Prospective observational cohort
  • Participants: 1079 patients undergoing elective noncardiac cancer surgery with curative intent
  • Time frame: July 2020 – December 2021
  • Centers: 16 centers across North America, Asia, and Europe
Objectives
  • Primary endpoint: 1-year all-cause mortality
  • Secondary endpoints:
    • 30-day morbidity and mortality
    • Cancer-specific 1-year mortality
    • Overall survival (OS)
    • Postoperative complications
Major findings
Transfusion rates and triggers
  • 21.1% of patients received perioperative pRBC transfusions.
  • Transfusions typically occurred when hemoglobin (Hb) fell between 7 and 9 g/dL.
  • Only 9% of transfusions were due to overt organ hypoperfusion, indicating a potentially liberal use of transfusions.
Mortality impact
  • 1-year mortality was 19.7% in transfused patients vs 6.5% in non-transfused.
  • Dose-response relationship observed:
    • 0 units: 7.2% mortality
    • 1–2 units: 18.2%
    • 2 units: 31%
Cancer progression and survival
  • Cancer progression within 1 year:
    • Transfused: 32.6%
    • Nontransfused: 18.9%
  • Cancer-specific 1-year mortality:
    • Transfused: 13.6%
    • Nontransfused: 4.6%
  • Overall survival:
    • Transfused patients had an 85% higher hazard of death
Why might transfusions worsen outcomes?

Several mechanisms may explain this association:

  • Transfusion-related immunomodulation (TRIM):
    • pRBCs contain > 3000 proteins that suppress immune functions.
    • Inhibition of cytotoxic T cells and monocytes.
    • Increased levels of prostaglandins, growth factors, and angiogenic cytokines.
  • Promotion of cancer microenvironment:
    • Enhances conditions favorable to tumor recurrence and metastasis.
  • Storage-related damage:
    • Longer storage times increase oxidative stress and decrease red cell efficacy.
Postoperative complications in transfused patients

Transfused patients had significantly more postoperative issues, including:

  • Higher ICU admission rates
  • Longer hospital stays (median: 7 vs 4 days)
  • Higher rates of:
    • Sepsis
    • Acute kidney injury (AKI)
    • Postoperative bleeding
    • Wound infections
    • Delirium
Implementing patient blood management (PBM)

A structured PBM program can help mitigate risks associated with transfusions. The World Health Organization (WHO) supports global adoption of PBM protocols.

1. Identify and treat preoperative anemia
  • Hemoglobin check at least 4 weeks before surgery
  • IV or oral iron supplements
  • Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents when appropriate
2. Minimize intraoperative blood loss
  • Laparoscopic over open surgery where possible
  • Use of antifibrinolytics (e.g., tranexamic acid)
  • Normothermia to support coagulation
3. Adopt restrictive transfusion thresholds
  • Consider transfusion only when Hb < 7 g/dL in stable patients
  • Evaluate organ function and perfusion
4. Educate clinicians and patients
  • Regular training and awareness programs
  • Multidisciplinary teamwork


Conclusion

The ARCA-1 study provides robust, international data demonstrating that perioperative blood transfusions in cancer surgery are associated with significantly worse outcomes, including 1-year mortality, cancer progression, and postoperative complications. The findings advocate for a paradigm shift toward personalized transfusion practices and comprehensive patient blood management strategies.

For patients and providers, the message is clear: Blood is life-saving, but not risk-free. Use it wisely.

Reference: Cata JP et al. The Association Between Perioperative Red Blood Cell Transfusions and 1-Year Mortality After Major Cancer Surgery: An International Multicenter Observational Study. Anesth Analg. 2025;140:782-794.

For more information on blood transfusions, check out Anesthesia Updates on the NYSORA Anesthesia Assistant App

Get access to step-by-step management algorithms, the latest research, and peer-reviewed insights—all in one place. Download the app today and experience the future of anesthesia education and decision-making.

AI On Call: Case of the Week

A 67-year-old man is scheduled for elective open colon cancer resection. He has mild anemia (Hb 10.2 g/dL) but is hemodynamically stable. Intraoperatively, his Hb drops to 8.6 g/dL. Should you transfuse?

Here’s what the Anesthesia Assistant recommends doing: