Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Outpatient Surgery


Based on Christina M. Spofford, Peter Foldes, and John Laur


An increasing number of patients are undergoing surgical pro- cedures in hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs) or ambu- latory surgery centers (ASCs).1 Outpatient surgical procedures have become more complex, and patients are presenting for surgery with a greater number of comorbid conditions than in the past.2

Regional anesthesia (RA) and peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) can help meet the goals of caring for these patients in the outpatient setting. In 1976, there were 67 Medicare-certified ASCs in the United States, and in 2011, there were 5,344.3 In 1982, 30 ambulatory surgical procedures were covered by Medicare; today there are hundreds.4

In an analysis of National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery (NSAS) data, Tighe et al. found that 15% of an estimated 4 million orthopedic outpatient cases imple- mented a “regional block” as part of the anesthetic used.6,7 Over 580,000 PNBs were performed in HOPDs or ASCs in 2006.5 From 2006 to 2010, outpatient services per Medicare enrollee increased by 5.7% annually. In 2011, the rate increased by 1.9%, accounting for $3.4 billion in charges, a 2.2% increase from 2010.3,4 Currently, about 57 million outpatient procedures (surgical and nonsurgical) are performed in the United States at a cost of $3.2 billion.4,8 In 2014, over 3 million of these cases are estimated to be orthopedic procedures.5 At some institutions, including the authors’, most PNBs are per- formed for orthopedic cases.9

Based on NSAS data from 1996 through 2006, arthroscopic knee procedures in the U.S. increased by 49%.10 As minimally invasive surgery becomes available for surgeries that require an inpatient stay due to the severity of postoperative pain, RA can allow for safe same-day discharge.11 A study by Koenig and Gu indicated that the growth of ASCs may reduce Medicare spending due to lower reimbursements relative to number of hospitals.12 There is preliminary evidence that outcomes at ASCs are better than those at in-hospital settings for similar otolaryngologic surgical cases.13 Future research in this area needs to be completed for other services. With the growth in both complex outpatient surgeries and ASCs, there is a need for more anesthesiologists with specific training in the use of acute pain medicine with integrated RA and PNB techniques. With the use of these techniques, the first priority should be on safety, the second on reducing patient pain and minimizing opioid and general anesthesia (GA) side effects, the third on economics, and the fourth on efficiency.14,15

Outpatient Surgery Stakeholders

Patients, providers, payers, and “internal customers,” including anesthesiologists, nurses, and support staff,16 may have differing views on the value on the various outpatient operational and clinical outcomes. In healthcare, value is defined as patient outcome per costs used to achieve those outcomes.17,18 For pay- ers, value consists of providing a service with good outcome at a lower cost than competitors.4,5,16 Typically, a standalone out- patient surgery center can provide patient care with greater patient convenience and lower overhead costs than a hospital outpatient surgery department.1

Busy surgeons focus on ASC efficiency 19 and understand the value of RA and PNBs, but they may object to additional procedures that could delay surgery. 20 The available data, however, point out that greater than half of surgery-start delays are caused by the surgeon rather than nerve block placement.21 Factors that contribute to delays include the need for surgical consent, updating the patient’s medical his- tory and performing the physical examination, the patient’s desire to speak with the surgeon prior to going to the operating room (OR), and the need for additional preoperative testing. 20 Anesthesiologists work to provide safe high-quality care by applying methods that reduce or prevent adverse events and side-effects. Minimizing or eliminating nausea, vomiting, and pain are important for maintaining patient satisfaction. Sec- ondary goals for anesthesiologists include accurate and fast RA placement and nerve block onset, sufficient duration of analge- sia, avoidance of “rebound pain” when the nerve block resolves, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) bypass, and rapid patient discharge from the facility.15,18 Avoiding side effects, hence bypassing the PACU, can reduce hospital costs by an estimated 12% while still meeting the goals of the surgeons, anesthesiolo- gists, payers, and patients. 18,20,22

Patients fear nausea, vomiting, gagging on the endotracheal tube, surgical pain, recall, residual weakness, shivering, sore throat, and somnolence. They wish to experience restful sleep and then return to work and physical function with little pain or motor blockade.23 Most of these patient-centric goals can be achieved by designing an appropriate anesthesia regimen tai- lored to the patient and surgical procedure(s). In many cases, the use of RA achieves these goals.

Clinical Pearls

  • The anesthesiologist’s priorities are (1) safety; (2) reduc- ing patient pain and minimizing opioid and GA side effects; (3) economics; and (4) efficiency.
  • Factors that contribute to surgery-start delays include the need for surgical consent, updating the patient’s medical history and performing the physical examina- tion, the patient’s desire to speak with the surgeon prior to going to the OR, and
    the need for additional preop- erative testing.
  • Hospital costs can be reduced by bypassing the PACU while meeting the goals of the surgeon, anesthesiologist, payers, and patient through the avoidance of side effects.
  • Most patient-centric goals can be achieved by designing an appropriate anesthesia regimen tailored to the patient and surgical procedure(s).

Defining Outpatient Regional Anesthesia Success

There are multiple, and possibly overlapping, metrics defining outpatient RA success.18 A single set of outcomes may not please all stakeholders. In randomized, controlled trials (RCTs), success is determined by avoiding the following: conversion to GA, loss of sensation to pin-prick or cold, loss of motor function, and time to first pain medication request.18 Many RCTs ask about patient satisfaction with RA, and it is important to understand what patients prefer with respect to outcomes after RA.22 Recently, a validated, multidimensional, self-reported question- naire was created to assess RA in the outpatient surgery setting.24

Factors included avoiding RA-related delays and complications, providing anesthesia during the surgical procedure and continu- ing adequate postoperative analgesia, reducing the costs of drugs and equipment, reducing patient time spent in the healthcare facility, avoiding unplanned hospital admissions, ensuring patient satisfaction, maintaining postoperative function (partic- ularly with a partially or wholly insensate body region), safety at home, and other clinical and economic outcomes. Motor weakness can be desirable for surgery yet is often undesirable afterward when physical therapy is necessary or patients want to walk or hold an object.25 While acknowledging that RA is superior to GA in terms of pain control and reduc- tion of postoperative nausea and vomiting, orthopedic surgeons often report avoiding RA due to case-start delays and unpre- dictable RA success.26

div style=”background: #425f8a;color: #fff;margin: 20px;padding: 20px”>

Clinical Pearls

  • Numerous factors must be taken into account in the outpatient surgery setting, including avoiding RA- related delays and complications, providing anesthesia during the surgical procedure and continuing adequate postoperative analgesia, reducing the costs of drugs and equipment, reducing patient time spent in the health- care facility, avoiding unplanned hospital admissions, ensuring patient satisfaction, maintaining postoperative function (particularly with a partially or wholly insen- sate body region), safety at home, and other clinical and economic outcomes.

Peripheral Nerve Blocks and Multimodal Analgesia

Managing postoperative pain with minimal side effects is an important factor in determining if a surgical case can proceed in an outpatient setting. An anesthesiologist has an armamen- tarium of agents and methods to provide multimodal analgesic therapy. Boezaart and Tighe contend that PNBs are an inherent part of the rapidly developing field of acute pain medicine that they remark should focus on the patient and his or her pain control.
13 In an outpatient setting, RA with PNBs is a corner- stones of multimodal analgesia and opioid-sparing strategies. High-dose opioids can cause hyperalgesia by activating neurons and glial cells.27 Furthermore, potent opioids, such as remifen- tanil and fentanyl, can cause hyperalgesia and rapid tolerance in humans.
28 Other undesirable side effects are nausea, somno- lence, and respiratory depression, all which are highly undesir- able in the outpatient setting.

Well-planned multimodal analgesia is important in the ambulatory surgery setting for several reasons. First, patients prefer to avoid side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and somnolence. 22,29 Second, uncontrolled side effects can result in unplanned hospital admission, which is costly and inconve- nient for all parties. Third, the use of multimodal analgesia has the potential for real synergistic positive effects while also reducing the likelihood of serious side effects.2

Lastly, multi-modal analgesic regimens improve the likelihood of early recovery.30 One example is the same-day discharge of patients undergoing unicompartment knee replacement surgery. By utilizing a con- tinuous femoral nerve block and minimizing opioids as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen, these patients can safely undergo surgery in an ASC.10

Used in a multimodal analgesic regimen, gabapentinoids, non- steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acyclooxygenase-1 and -2 (COX-1 and COX-2) inhibitors, glucocorticoids, ket- amine, clonidine, and lidocaine infusions can reduce postopera- tive opioid use by 20%–60%.31–34 Intravenous lidocaine infusions have demonstrated a preventive analgesic effect lasting from 8.5 to 72 hours, which is greater than 5.5 lidocaine half-lives.35 Local anesthetic may reduce pain scores and opioid consump- tion when administered via PNB or the intravenous route (using lidocaine), although the evidence for this is sometimes contradictory. 34,36

Some facilities are performing “fast-track” total hip and knee replacement surgeries in an outpatient setting with 23-hour observation. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons guidelines on preventing venous thromboembolism recommend neuraxial anesthesia during hip and knee replacement procedures to reduce blood loss.37 In fact, due to its superior analgesia in joint replacement surgery, RA is the centerpiece of a multimodal analgesia algorithm in such surgeries.38

Clinical Pearls

  • PNBs have progressed to become a component of the larger field of acute pain medicine that focuses on the patients and their pain control.
  • In the outpatient setting, RA with PNBs is the corner- stone of multimodal analgesia.

Nerve Blocks in Outpatients

A wide variety of PNBs can be used in the ambulatory setting, including upper and lower extremity blocks, truncal blocks, and head-and-neck PNBs (Table–1). Moreover, neuraxial RA techniques can achieve outpatient anesthesia goals.39 In an ambulatory setting, surgeon-performed blocks can also be timely, cost effective, and remarkably safe. Done at the time of the procedure, they often include rapidly acting local anesthet- ics. Some of the most commonly used peripheral nerve blocks are listed in (Table–2.) 40–43

TABLE 1. Peripheral nerve blocks.

Upper Extremity PNBs

Lower Extremity PNBs

Truncal Blocks

TCervical paravertebral

Subgluteal sciatic

Thoracic paravertebral



Transverse abdominis plane








Block Latency

One strategy to decrease onset time is to add mepivacaine to the longer-acting local anesthetics that are traditionally used (eg, ropivacaine, bupivacaine), albeit at the cost of shortening the duration of the blockade.44,45 The best strategy is to have one provider perform the nerve block in the block room and have the other providers remain in the operating room. This proce- dure prevents delays in turnover, optimizes care by having a dedicated person providing specialized care, and creates a team atmosphere. This model can either be expensive or pay for itself, depending on the system and methods of reimbursement for care.46 For example, it can be cost prohibitive in practices where there are too few blocks placed in a single day or too few personnel trained in peripheral nerve blockade.20

TABLE 2. Commonly used regional anesthesia blocks.


Lower Type of Block


Retrobulbar, peribulbar

General surgery





Joint injections, local infiltration

Vascular surgery

Cervical plexus blocks


Paracervical block

Peripheral Nerve Blocks and Adjuvants

Regional anesthesiologists combine local anesthetics with adju- vant drugs to achieve prolonged analgesia, reduce local anes- thetic dose to avoid toxicity, and potentially reduce motor blockade. 34,47,48 Clinical doses of clonidine, buprenorphine, dexamethasone, and midazolam have no neurotoxicity in vitro. 46,49,50 These drugs are thought to act through an indirect mechanism without influencing the potency or duration of the local anesthetic, specifically ropivacaine or lidocaine.49 Providing surgical anesthesia and then maintaining the patient’s motor strength while achieving postoperative analgesia may be difficult with single local injections. Adjuvants can prolong analgesia duration with single-injection PNBs.34,51,52

This application reduces the mechanical, logistical, billing, and clinical management hurdles associated with outpatient indwelling PNB catheters and improves patient convenience.53 While clonidine and dexmedetomidine may prolong analgesic duration in some blocks, these agents may not have the samebenefit in other blocks (eg, sciatic) when combined with a long-acting local anesthetic.54–56 The undesirable side effects of cloni- dine (and other alpha-2 blockers) include hypotension,bradycardia, orthostatic hypotension, and sedation.53 Clonidine increases the duration of motor blockade, which may or may not be desirable depending on the type of surgery.55

Dexamethasone is an adjuvant that can enhance or pro-long the duration of analgesia when injected perineurally or intravenously.57–62 Recent work suggests that perineuraladjuvants can control post-surgical pain while sparing motor strength.15 However, safety data on perineural injections in ani- mals are limited, and human safety data are also lacking.46 Most PNB adjuvant drugs are used off label in the U.S.

Clinical Pearls

  • Clinical doses of clonidine, buprenorphine, dexametha- sone, and midazolam have been shown to have no neu- rotoxicity in vitro.
  • Adjuvants may prolong analgesia duration with single- injection PNBs. Dexamethasone enhances and prolongs analgesia injected perineurally or intravenously.

Sedation for Ambulatory Peripheral Nerve Blocks

Patients having surgery on an outpatient basis are typically healthier than patients having surgery as inpatients and may have limited or no previous experience with surgery.63 Many patients undergoing surgical procedures experience preopera- tive anxiety.64–66 In an effort to improve the perioperative expe- rience, short-acting anxiolytic agents and/or other medications (eg, midazolam, opioids, ketamine, gabapentinoids) are often given before a PNB is placed.67,68 Historically, the placement of a PNB using anatomical landmarks has led to multiple attempts at nerve location (ie, seeking a specific motor response to elec- trical nerve stimulation). Adding nerve stimulation can help confirm proper needle location but may cause considerable discomfort to the patient.69 Even with ultrasound guidance and the use of local anesthetics to anesthetize the needle pathway, many patients benefit from judicious premedication before undergoing PNB. Heavy premedication, however, may lead to loss of airway tone and subsequent hypoxia and hypercapnia.70

Premedicating patients judiciously while maintaining a mean- ingful patient contact may improve the patient’s experience and allow for beneficial patient feedback during the procedure.

From a cost perspective, premedicated patients require bedside monitoring, and more personnel may be required depending on the physical layout, surgical case workload, and current staffing levels. Furthermore, heavily premedicated patients may take longer to recover and need to remain within the surgical center longer,71 resulting in patient dissatisfaction. Lastly, froma patient satisfaction perspective, patients may appreciate ongo- ing dialogue and reassurance as the block is being placed and the opportunity of being an active participant in their care. In an effort to reduce patient wait times, patients are instructed to arrive close to the time of surgical start based on mathematical principles. 72

The Block Team and Block Nurse

In academic training centers, residents and fellows can be orga- nized into block teams.19,20,73 These teams can provide safe and efficient RA while allowing trainees to focus on a single aspect of their education. A multidisciplinary group at Duke Univer- sity initiated a “block nurse” team in 2010. Block nurses com- pleted a focused training program that emphasized patient flow, educating and preparing patients, assisting anesthesiologists, monitoring patients, and enhancing safety during the pre, intra- and post-procedure periods. Within a year, rapid OR turnover time increased by 26%, OR on-time starts increased by 7%, orthopedic cases receiving preoperative blocks increased by 19%, and patient safety (eg, no wrong-sided blocks) improved. 8

While resources are lean at free-standing ASCs, the block nurse concept could perhaps be incorporated into an existing nursing team, thus potentially improving a facility’s processes by increasing the number of patients who can benefit from preoperative PNB, increasing PACU bypass rates, and improving patient satisfaction.

PACU Bypass Criteria

Fast-tracking patients is an important goal of ambulatory anes- thesia strategy.74 In a meta-analysis by Liu et al. of 15 trials including 1003 patients given central neuraxial block (CNB) and 7 trials of 359 patients given PNB, for RA versus GA, induction time was increased 9 minutes.75 There was a greater PACU bypass with PNB versus CNB, perhaps due to lack of a formal PACU bypass criteria for CNB patients. The odds of bypassing PACU using PNB was 14 times greater compared to GA. Both PNB and CNB patients reported an increased satis- faction level compared to GA patients, though PNB patient satisfaction was much higher than those having CNB. Patients receiving regional anesthesia reported lower pain scores, had less need of analgesics, and experienced less nausea and vomit- ing. 76 Williams et al. and others who matched interventional technique to surgical pain15,72 have remarked on the possibility of “rebound pain,” that is, pain above baseline that patients experience after a nerve block resolves.77,78 Breast surgery on an outpatient basis using thoracic paraver- tebral blocks is another good example of the benefits of PNBs. sup class=”s3″>79

A review article by Thavaneswaran et al. has shown that length of stay was reduced for breast surgery when using paravertebral block versus GA alone. Length of hospital stay, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and patient satisfaction were improved over GA (relative risk 0.25; 95% CI 0.13–0.50).80

Clinical Pearls

  • In the fast-paced outpatient setting, assistance in setting up equipment, preparing and positioning patients, monitoring patients after blockade, and educating patients regarding safety and protection of insensate body regions are important.


Through 2007, most literature reports on RA outcomes were based on neuraxial techniques.81 Since 2007, more literature has been published focusing on PNBs in outpatient surgery settings.

Improved outcomes from neuraxial use in the outpatient sur- gery setting include improved short-term and long-term pain control, reduced surgical stress, improved gastrointestinal function, lower rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and fewer unplanned admissions or readmissions.73–75,78 More physiologi- cally significant outcomes include reductions in perioperative myocardial infarction, pulmonary complications, and mortality.83,84 However, a systematic study of these outcomes in ambulatory patients has not been published, and it is unclear whether outpa- tient surgical patients would achieve the same benefit.

In an effort to improve care after colorectal surgery, a work- ing group analyzed outcomes from randomized controlled trials published through 2007 for colorectal surgeries and created recommendations for the use of thoracic epidural catheters, avoiding long-acting opioids, reducing the amount of time under GA, and preventing gut paralysis.85,86 Epidurals provide efficient analgesia, reduce surgical stress responses, and mini- mize the side effects of systemic opioid administration (pulmo- nary, gastrointestinal, and cognitive dysfunction). Once RA methods are discontinued, the use of NSAIDs further reduces or avoids the need for opioid administration and their side effects. RA has been demonstrated to improve outcomes such as mortality, major morbidity, and rehabilitation.87 Since superior pain control has been shown with the use of RA, focus on functional outcome improvement has become paramount. 88 This requires the ability to measure outcomes accurately. For outpatient RA outcomes, some measures include electromechanical dynamometer, which measures motor con- traction; the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36),which measures physical and mental status before and after surgery; and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), which assesses pain and stiff- ness in the hips and knees. The recently validated Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PRO- MIS) is a computerized, adaptive test that provides an excellent method for assessing outcomes in patients who have had foot or ankle surgery.89

In recent years, functional outcome studies comparing RA to GA have shown a tendency toward improved early outcomes with RA. 90,91 Patients undergoing stable fixation of distal radius fracture under brachial plexus block demonstrated improved pain scores and better wrist and finger motion at all time points during follow-up compared to GA. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores also demonstrated higher function at both 3 and 6 months (P = 0.04 and P = 0.02, respectively).88 Spinal anesthesia is used for outpatient lower extremity surgery. Compared to GA, patients undergoing ankle fracture fixation under spinal anesthesia reported improved early pain scores and function as measured by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Clinical Rating Scale at 3 months (mean [SD] 81.7 [11.9] vs 78.1 [15.2], P = 0.02).92 At 6 months, spinal patients had lower pain scores (P = 0.04). Functional outcomes for the spinal group were not statistically significant by 6 and 12 months.

Clinical Pearls

  • RA has been demonstrated to improve outcomes such as mortality, major morbidity, and rehabilitation.

Complications in the Ambulatory Setting

Complications of regional anesthesia range from minor sensory deficits that resolve within weeks to devastating injuries that result in permanent nerve injury, strokes, and on occasion, death.93–95 Cardiac dysrhythmias can occur
as late as 30–75 minutes after the injection of local anesthetics and may be intractable despite adherence to advanced cardiac life support guidelines.
<sup class=”s3″>96 This delayed response highlights the need for continuous monitor- ing of patients in the block area as well as the operating room.

Although uncommon, local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) can be a life-threatening complication for patients. Guidelines on the care of patients with LAST include airway management, prevent hyperventilation (to avoid increase in seizure thresh- old), and treating a seizure if it occurs, intravenous lipid emul- sion therapy, and transfer to a tertiary care setting with cardiopulmonary bypass capability.97 Ambulatory facilities should consider creating LAST kits with checklists that are housed in the areas where blocks are performed.95 Fortunately, ultrasound guidance coupled with decreasing doses and vol- umes of local anesthetics required for successful nerve blockade have resulted in a substantial decrease in the risk of LAST, a trend likely to continue as ultrasound-guided techniques become more refined.98

Other complications, such as wrong-sided blocks, can be greatly reduced by adherence to established time-out policies. Block site marking, as well as encouraging patients to engage in dialogue during block placement, can reinforce a culture of safety. 99 Permanent nerve injuries, with subsequent long-term morbidity and/or disability are uncommon.100 The develop- ment of more objective methods of monitoring needle place- ment and administering local anesthetics, such as ultrasound guidance, low-current nerve stimulation, and opening injection pressure monitoring are likely to even further decrease the risk of intrafascicular injection and neurologic injury.101–103 When present, however, intrafascicular injections and neurologic inju- ries require a thorough evaluation, and expert consultation by a neurologist should be considered.

When an RA complication occurs, prompt and well- planned disclosure is warranted. When possible, a quiet, private area is required for patient and family disclosure. Anesthesiologists should have another member of the healthcare team present during the disclosure. The provider should investigate how much is known about the adverse event and how much detail the patient and family require. With empathy, knowledge of the event needs to be conveyed in a manner that is clear and understandable. This often requires planned pauses, repetition of information, reassur- ance, and open body language. Saying “I’m sorry this event happened to you” does not imply fault; rather, it is a state- ment of empathy about the adverse event and the subse- quent pain, suffering, or other inconvenience that may have been experienced. Lastly, all disclosure discussions need to be documented and patients and/or family need to have a mechanism for further follow-up.104 Several studies suggest that thoughtful and prompt disclosure of adverse events or complications results in less legal action and possibly less emotional impact on the provider.105,106 Hadzic_Ch51_p931-938.indd 935

Clinical Pearls

  • Guidelines on the care of patients who experience toxic reactions from local anesthetics include airway manage- ment, hyperventilation on prevention, seizure control, intravenous lipid emulsion therapy, and consideration of transfer to a tertiary
    care setting with cardiopulmonary bypass capability.
  • Ambulatory facilities should develop LAST kits with checklists that are housed in the area where blocks are performed.
  • Thoughtful and prompt disclosure of adverse events or complications may prevent or lessen the legal action and diminish the emotional impact on all parties.

Objective monitoring of the needle–nerve relationship and injection process during PNB, such as via ultrasound guidance, low-current intensity nerve stimulation, and avoidance of high opening injection pressures (> 15 psi), can further decrease the risk of already uncommon neurologic complications.

Peripheral Nerve Blocks and Outpatient Surgery Economics

Patient satisfaction, while perhaps intuitive in some ways, is not easily measured in a scientifically valid manner. In the United States, patient satisfaction and whether patients would recom- mend their family or friends to have surgery at a facility or institution are correlated with improved operating revenue margins. 14,107 A new patient-centered assessment by Szamburski et al. is the first psychometrically evaluated, internally and externally validated patient satisfaction instrument developed to date.108 This new measure may prove useful in future work investigating linkages between RA and outcomes or economic indicators.

Physician-owned free-standing ASCs, through a profit motive, may be an incentive for physicians to divert cases from hospital operating rooms to their own centers.1 ASCs have lower overhead than hospitals but are paid less by Medicare.1 Physicians may also choose to steer their patients toward ASCs based on nonfinancial factors, such as convenience, enhanced patient experience, ease of scheduling, and the ability to com- plete more cases per day than in a hospital environment. An analysis of the 1996 and 2006 NSAS data found that a 10% increase in profit (facility fees, not professional fees) was associ- ated with a 1.2%–1.4% increase in the probability that a sur- gery would be performed at an ASC. 1

The presence and type of insurance also influence the choice to provide a PNB. When compared with self-pay patients or those receiving charity care, patients with government-paid care or private insurance were roughly 2.5 times more likely to receive a nerve block.5

However, this association is not necessar- ily causal, and other confounding factors are likely to be involved. Hospital revenue streams may be reduced as patients are recruited to have surgery at nonhospital ASCs.5 This may lower societal healthcare costs since ASCs are reimbursed at lower rates and have lower overhead costs than hospitals for a given procedure.4,5,11

By implementing RA techniques, facilities can potentially lower costs and enhance efficiency. One report demonstrated that when RA is used in a hospital at a rate higher than the median of its competing hospitals, that hospital can reduce patient length of stay and increase profit per diagnosis-related group (DRG) while also increasing patient satisfaction and reducing complications.109

Clinical Pearls

  • By implementing RA techniques, facilities may be able to lower costs and enhance efficiency.
  • Hospitals that use RA at a rate higher than the median of competing hospitals may reduce patient length of stay and increase profit per DRG while increasing patient satisfaction and reducing complications.



Outpatient surgical cases are increasing, and regional anesthetic techniques, including PNB, are amenable to the types of cases performed in the outpatient setting. RA and PNBs can benefit patients by avoiding the side effects of GA and opioids. RA techniques and the use of local anesthetics are a major com- ponent of a multimodal analgesia and anesthesia plan. RA techniques offer improved patient outcomes, do not dispropor- tionately delay case start time, can improve fast-tracking of patients, and may enhance economic outcomes for a facility. Complications may occur, however, and providers should be prepared to handle these situations appropriately, particularly in a standalone ASC with fewer resources than hospitals.



1 Plotzke MR, Courtemanche C: Does procedure profitability impact whether an outpatient surgery is performed at an ambulatory surgery center or hospital? Health Econ 2011;20:817–830.

2 Joshi GP: Multimodal analgesia techniques for ambulatory surgery. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2005;43:197–204.

3 Medicare Payment Advisory Commission: Report to Congress: Medicare Payment Policy Published March, 2013. Accessed June 28, 2013.

4Manchikanti L, Parr AT, Singh V, Fellows B: Ambulatory surgery centers and interventional techniques: A look at long-term survival. Pain Physician 2011;14:E177–E215.

5Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Report to Congress: Medicare Payment Policy. Published March 2013. Accessed June 28, 2013.

6 Tighe, PJ, Brennan M, Moser M, et al: Primary payer status is associated with the use of nerve block placement for ambulatory orthopedic surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2012;37:254–261.

7 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery. Page last updated May 4, 2010. Accessed June 27, 2013.

8Cullen KA, Hall MJ, Golosinskiy A: Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006. Natl Health Stat Report 2009;28:1–25.

9Russell RA, Burke K, Gattis K: Implementing a regional anesthesia block nurse team in the perianesthesia care unit increases patient safety and perioperative efficiency. J Perianesth Nurs 2013;28:3–10.

10 Kim S, Bosque J, Meehan JP, et al: Increase in outpatient knee arthroscopy in the United States: a comparison of National Surveys of Ambulatory Surgery, 1996 and 2006. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93: 994–1000.

11 Dervin GF, Madden SM, Crawford-Newton BA, et al: Outpatient unicompartment knee arthroplasty with indwelling femoral nerve catheter. J Arthroplasty 2012;27:1159–1165.e1.

12 Koenig L, Gu Q: Growth of ambulatory surgery centers, surgery volume, and savings to Medicare. Am J Gastroenterol 2013;108:10–15.

13 Grisel J, Arjmand, E: Comparing quality at an ambulatory surgery center and a hospital-based facility: Preliminary findings. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;141:701–709.

14 Boezaart AP, Tighe PJ: The progression of regional anesthesia into acute and perioperative pain medicine. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2011;49:104–109.

15 Lee F. If Disney ran your hospital: 9-1/2 things you would do differently. Swanson G, ed. Bozeman, MT: Second River Healthcare; 2004:28.

16 Williams BA: Forecast for perineural analgesia procedures for ambulatory surgery of the knee, foot, and ankle: applying patient-centered paradigm shifts. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2011;50:126–142.

17 Porter ME: What is value in health care? N Engl J Med 2010;363: 2477–2481.

18 Porter ME, Teisberg EO. Redefining Health Care: Creating Value-Based Competition on Results. Boston: Harvard Business School; 2006.

19 Faraj WA, Brull R: Making sense of block “success” in ambulatory anesthesia practice. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2011;49:1–9.

20 Eappen S, Flanagan H, Lithman R, et al: The addition of a regional block team to the orthopedic operating rooms does not improve anesthesia-controlled times and turnover time in the setting of long turnover times. J Clin Anesth 2007;19:85–91.

21Chelly JE, Horne JL, Hudson ME: Factors impacting on-time transfer to the operating room in patients undergoing peripheral nerve blocks in the preoperative area. J Clin Anesth 2010;22:115–121.

22 Williams BA, Kentor ML, Vogt MT, et al: Potential hospital cost savings via associated postanesthesia care unit bypass and same-day discharge. Anesthesiology 2004;100:697–706.

23 Macario AA, Weinger MM, Carney SS, et al: Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are important to avoid? The perspective of patients. Anesth Analg 1999;89:652–658.

24 Maurice-Szamburski A, Bruder N, Loundou, A, et al: Development and validation of a perioperative satisfaction questionnaire in regional anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2013;118:78–87.

25 Fredrickson MJ, Smith KR, Wong AC: Importance of volume and concentration for ropivacaine interscalene block in preventing recovery room pain and minimizing motor block after shoulder surgery. Anesthesiology 2010;112:1374–1381.

26 Oldman M, McCartney CJ, Leung A, et al: A survey of orthopedic surgeons’ attitudes and knowledge regarding regional anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2004;98:1486–1490.

27 Richebé P, Rivat C, Laulin JP, et al: Ketamine improves the management of exaggerated postoperative pain observed in perioperative fentanyl- treated rats. Anesthesiology 2005;102:421–428.

28 Chia YY, Liu K, Wang, JJ, et al: Intraoperative high dose fentanyl induces postoperative fentanyl tolerance. Can J Anaesth 1999;46: 872–877.

29Macario A, Weinger M, Truong P, et al: Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are both common and important to avoid? The perspective of a panel of expert anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg 1999;88:1085–1091.

30 Young A, Buvanendran A: Multimodal systemic and intra-articular analgesics. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2011;49:117–133.

31 Tiippana EM, Hamunen K, Kontinen VK, et al: Do surgical patients benefit from perioperative gabapentin/pregabalin? A systematic review of efficacy and safety. Anesth Analg 2007;10:1545–1556.

32 White PF, Sacan O, Tufanogullari B, et al: Effect of short-term postoperative celecoxib administration on patient outcome after outpatient laparoscopic surgery. Can J Anesth 2007;54:342–348.

33 Salerno A, Hermann R: Efficacy and safety of steroid use for postoperative pain relief. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88A:1361–1372.

34 Oliveira GS de, Agarwal D, Benzon HT: Perioperative single dose ketorolac to prevent postoperative pain. Anesth Analg 2012;114: 424–433.

35Barreveld, A, Witte J, Chahal H, et al: Preventive analgesia by local anesthetics. Anesth Analg 2013;116:1141–1161.

36 McKay A, Gottschalk A, Ploppa A, et al: Systemic lidocaine decreased the perioperative opioid analgesic requirements but failed to reduce discharge time after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 2009;109: 1805–1808.

37 Mont MA, Jacobs JJ, Boggio LN, et al: Preventing venous thromboembolic disease in patients undergoing elective hip and knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011;19:786–776.

38 Kettner SC, Willschke H, Marhofer P: Does regional anaesthesia really improve outcome? Br J Anaesth 2011;107(Suppl 1):i90–i95.

39Hurford WE: Updates in head-to-toe applications of regional anesthesia for ambulatory surgery. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2012;50:x–xi.

40 Mercier RJ, Zerden ML: Intrauterine anesthesia for gynecologic procedures: A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:669–677.

41 Lee E, Khandwala M, Jones C: A randomised controlled trial to compare patient satisfaction with two different types of local anaesthesia in ptosissurgery. Orbit 2009;28:388–391.

42Varitimidis S, Venouziou A, Dailiana Z, et al: Triple nerve block at the knee for foot and ankle surgery performed by the surgeon: Difficulties and efficiency. Foot Ankle Int 2009;30:854–859.

43 Cyna A, Middleton P: Caudal epidural block versus other methods of postoperative pain relief for circumcision in boys. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 2008;4:CD003005.

44 Laur JJ, Bayman EO, Foldes PJ, et al: Triple-blind randomized clinical trial of time until sensory change using 1.5% mepivacaine with epinephrine, 0.5% bupivacaine, or an equal mixture of both for infraclavicular block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2012;37:28–33.

45 Gadsden J, Hadzic A, Gandhi K, et al: The effect of mixing 1.5% mepivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine on duration of analgesia and latency of block onset in ultrasound-guided interscalene block. Anesth Analg 2011;112:471–476.

46 Hudson ME, Chelly JE, Williams BA: Economics: projecting costs and revenue for an interventional pain service in the ambulatory setting. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2011;49:68–83.

47 Williams BA, Hough KA, Tsui BYK, et al: Neurotoxicity of adjuvants used in perineural anesthesia and analgesia in comparison with ropivacaine. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2011;36:225–230.

48 Hogan Q: Pathophysiology of peripheral nerve injury during regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2008;33:435–441.

49Ibinson JW, Mangione MP, Williams, BA: Local anesthetics in diabetic rats (and patients). Reg Anesth Pain Med 2012;37:574–576.

50Yilmaz-Rastoder E, Gold MS, Hough KA, et al: Effect of adjuvant drugs on the action of local anesthetics in isolated rat sciatic nerves. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2012;37:403–409.

51 Jarbo K, Batra YK, Panda NB: Brachial plexus block with midazolam and bupivacaine improves analgesia. Can J Anaesth 2005;52:822–826.

52 Neal J, Gerancher J, Hebl J, et al: Upper extremity regional anesthesia: essentials of our current understanding, 2008. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009;34:134–170.

53 Goravanchi F, Kee SS, Kowalski AM, Berger, et al: A case series of thoracic paravertebral blocks using a combination of ropivacaine, clonidine, epinephrine, and dexamethasone. J Clin Anesth 2012;24: 664–667.

54 Fournier R, Faust A, Chassot O, et al: Perineural clonidine does not prolong levobupivacaine 0.5% after sciatic nerve block using the Labat approach in foot and ankle surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2012;37: 521–524.

55 Marhofer D, Kettner SC, Marhofer P, et al: Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine prolongs peripheral nerve block: a volunteer study. Br J Anaesth 2013;110:438–442.

56 Pöpping DM, Elia N, Marret E, et al: Clonidine as an adjuvant to local anesthetics for peripheral nerve and plexus blocks: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Anesthesiology 2009;111:406–415.

57 Rasmussen SB, Saied NN, Bowens C, et al: Duration of upper and lower extremity peripheral nerve blockade is prolonged with dexamethasone when added to ropivacaine: A retrospective database analysis. Pain Med 2013;14:1239–1247.

58 Desmet M, Braems H, Reynvoet M, et al: I.V. and perineural dexamethasone are equivalent in increasing the analgesic duration of a single-shot interscalene block with ropivacaine for shoulder surgery: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Br J Anaesth 2013;111:445–452.

59 Parrington SJ, O’Donnell D, Chan VW, et al: Dexamethasone added to mepivacaine prolongs the duration of analgesia after supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2010;35:422–426.

60 Vieira PA, Pulai I, Tsao GC, et al: Dexamethasone with bupivacaine increases duration of analgesia in ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus blockade. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010;27:285–288.

61Cummings KC III, Napierkowski DE, Parra-Sanchez I, et al: Effect of dexamethasone on the duration of interscalene nerve blocks with ropivacaine or bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth 2011;107:446–453.

62Abdallah FW, Johnson J, Chan V, et al: Intravenous dexamethasone and perineural dexamethasone similarly prolong the duration of analgesiaafter supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a randomized, triple-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2015;40: 125–132.

63Bryson G, Chung F, Finegan B, et al: Patient selection in ambulatory anesthesia—An evidence-based review: Part I. Can J Anaesth 2004;51: 768–781.

64 Lichtor JL, Johanson CE, Mhoon D, et al: Preoperative anxiety: Does anxiety level the afternoon before surgery predict anxiety level just before surgery? Anesthesiology 1987;67:595–598.

65 Brand LR, Munroe DJ, Gavin J: The effect of hand massage on preoperative anxiety in ambulatory surgery patients. AORN J 2013; 97:708–717.

66 Norris W, Baird WLM: Pre-operative anxiety: A study of the incidence and aetiology. Br J Anaesth 1967;39:503–509.

67 White PF, Tufanogullari B, Taylor J, et al: The effect of pregabalin on preoperative anxiety and sedation levels: A dose-ranging study. Anesth Analg 2009;108:1140–1145.

68 Shafer A, White PF, Urquhart ML, et al: Outpatient premedication: Use of midazolam and opioid analgesics. Anesthesiology 1989;71:495–501.

69 Bloc S, Mercadal L, Garnier T, et al: Comfort of the patient during axillary blocks placement: A randomized comparison of the neurostimulation and the ultrasound guidance techniques. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010;27:628–633.

70Eichhorn V, Henzler D, Murphy MF: Standardizing care and monitoring for anesthesia or procedural sedation delivered outside the operating room. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2010;23:494–499.

71 Viitanen H, Annila P, Viitanen M, et al: Premedication with midazolam delays recovery after ambulatory sevoflurane anesthesia in children. Anesth Analg 1999;89:75.

72Dexter F, Epstein R: Scheduling of cases in an ambulatory center. Anesthesiol Clin North America 2003;21:387–402.

73 Williams BA, Kentor ML, Williams JP, et al: PACU bypass after outpatient knee surgery is associated with fewer unplanned hospital admissions but more phase II nursing interventions. Anesthesiology 2002;97:981–988.

74 Carli F, Kehlet H, Baldini G, et al: Evidence basis for regional anesthesia in multidisciplinary fast-track surgical care pathways. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2011;36:63–72.

75 Liu SS, Strodtbeck WM, Richman JM, et al: A comparison of regional versus general anesthesia for ambulatory anesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg 2005;101:1634–1642.

76Fischer, B: Benefits, risks, and best practice in regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2010;35:545–548.

77DeMarco JR, Componovo R, Barfield WR, et al: Efficacy of augmenting a subacromial continuous-infusion pump with a preoperative interscalene block in outpatient arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A prospective, randomized, blinded, and placebo-controlled study. Arthroscopy 2011;

78Williams B, Bottegal M, Kentor M, et al: Rebound pain scores as a function of femoral nerve block duration after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Retrospective analysis of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2007;32:186–192.

79 Kitowski NJ, Landercasper J, Gundrum JD, et al: Local and paravertebral block anesthesia for outpatient elective breast cancer surgery. Arch Surg 2010;145:592–594.

80 Thavaneswaran P, Rudkin GE, Cooter RD, et al: Paravertebral block for anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2010;110:1740–1744.

81 Wu CL, Williams BA: Effects of regional anesthesia and analgesia on perioperative outcome. In Hadzic A (ed): NYSORA Textbook of Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. New York: McGraw Hill; 2007, p 1076.

82 Bernucci F, Carli F: Functional outcome after major orthopedic surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2012;25:621–628.

83 Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, et al: Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ 2000;321:1493–1504.

84Bonnet F, Maret E: Influence of anaesthetic and analgesic techniques on outcome after surgery. Br J Anaesth 2005;95:52–58.

85 Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, et al: Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr 2012;31:783–800.

86 Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg 2009;144: 961–969.

87Hanna MN, Murphy JD, Kumar K, et al: Regional techniques and outcome: what is the evidence? Curr Opin in Anaesthesiol 2009;22: 672–677.

88 Bernucci F, Carli F: Functional outcome after major orthopedic surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2012;25:621–628.

89 Man H, Baumhauer JF, Latt LD, et al: Validation of the PROMIS® physical function computerized adaptive tests for orthopaedic foot and ankle outcome research. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471:3466–3474.

90 Egol KAK, Soojian MGM, Walsh MM, et al: Regional anesthesia improves outcome after distal radius fracture fixation over general anesthesia. J Orthop Trauma 2012;26:545–549.

91Jordan C, Davidovitch RI, Walsh M, et al: Spinal anesthesia mediates improved early function and pain relief following surgical repair of ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92:368–374.

92 Jordan C, Davidovitch RI, Walsh M, et al: Spinal anesthesia mediates improved early function and pain relief following surgical repair of ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92(2):368–374.

93 Lee L, Posner K, Cheney F, et al: Complications associated with eye blocks and peripheral nerve blocks: An American Society of Anesthesiologists closed claims analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2008;33: 416–422.

94 Lee LA, Posner KL, Kent CD, Domino KB: Complications associated with peripheral nerve blocks: lessons from the ASA Closed Claims Project. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2011;49:56–67.

95Ben-David B: Complications of regional anesthesia: an overview. Anesthesiol Clin North America 2002;20:665–667.

96 Dix SK, Rosner GF, Nayar M, et al: Intractable cardiac arrest due to lidocaine toxicity successfully resuscitated with lipid emulsion. Crit Care Med 2011;39:872–874.

97 Neal JM, Mulroy MF, Weinberg GL: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine checklist for managing local anesthetic systemic toxicity: 2012 version. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2012;37:16–18.

98 Sites BD, Taenzer AH, Herrick MD, et al: Incidence of local anesthetic systemic toxicity and postoperative neurologic symptoms associated with 12,668 ultrasound-guided nerve blocks: an analysis from a prospective clinical registry. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2012;37:478–482.

99 Watson DS: Implementing the universal protocol. AORN J 2009; 90:283–287.

100Lee L, Posner K, Cheney F, et al: Complications associated with eye blocks and peripheral nerve blocks: An American Society of Anesthesiologists closed claims analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2008;3: 416–422.

101 Ip VH, Tsui BC: Practical concepts in the monitoring of injection pressures during peripheral nerve blocks. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2011; 49:67–80.

102 Tsui BC, Knezevich MP, Pillay JJ: Reduced injection pressures using a compressed air injection technique (CAIT): an in vitro study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2008;33:168–173.

103 Gadsden JC, Choi JJ, Lin E, Robinson A: Opening injection pressure consistently detects needle-nerve contact during ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block. Anesthesiology 2014;120:1246–1253.

104 Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, et al: SPIKES-A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist 205;5:302–311.

105 Boothman R, Imhoff S, Campbell DJ: Nurturing a culture of patient safety and achieving lower malpractice risk through disclosure: lessons learned and future directions. Front Health Serv Manage 2012;28:13–28.

106 Gazoni FM, Amato PE, Malik ZM, et al: The impact of perioperative catastrophes on anesthesiologists: results of a national survey. Anesth Analg 2012;114:598–603.

107 American Hospital Directory: Higher hospital margins distinguished by higher patient satisfaction. Healthc Financ Manage 2010;64:136.

108 Maurice-Szamburski A, Bruder N, Loundou A, et al: Development and validation of a perioperative satisfaction questionnaire in regional anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2013;118:78–87.

109 Heller AR, Bauer KR, Eberlein-Gonska M, et al: [Regional anaesthesia as advantage in competition between hospitals. Strategic market analysis]. Der Anaesthesist 2009;58:459–468.