New york school of regional anesthesiaILIOINGUINAL & ILIOHYPOGASTRIC BLOCKS By: Roy A. Greengrass, MD Table of contents
II. METHOD OF BLOCK
III. INDICATIONS & CONTRAINDICATIONS IV. CHOICE OF LOCAL ANESTHETIC V. COMPLICATIONS & HOW TO AVOID THEM VI. CONTINUOUS ILIOINGUINAL/ILIOHYPOGASTRIC BLOCKS
VII. SUMMARY VIII. REFERENCES introduction
“Almost all cases of hernia, with the possible exception of those in young children, could undoubtedly be subjected to the radical operation under local anesthesia.” This quote by Harvey Cushing reported in the Annals of Surgery in 1900 illustrates that over 100 years ago the attributes of regional anesthesia for lower abdominal and inguinal surgerywere appreciated. Ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric blocks are among the most frequently used regional blocks performed for these surgical procedures. Postherniorrhaphy pain is moderate to severe and often poorly controlled with opioids as the single modal therapy.1 Ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric blocks have been shown to significantly reduce pain associated with herniorrhaphy, regardless of whether the blocks are used as the primary anesthetic[2] or for pain control after general[3,4] or spinal[5] anesthesia. Anatomy
Method of block
Using the anatomic knowledge previously described, one needs to provide a method of block that allows accurate placement of local anesthetic both between the transversus abdominus and internal oblique muscles as well as between the internal oblique and external oblique muscles. Methods of local anesthetic administration that do not accurately define placement between these muscular layers provide inconsistent anesthesia and analgesia of the abdominal wall and inguinal region. Unfortunately, this may result in the reporting of inadequate analgesia for a procedure that is more a problem of technique than of the block itself.6 Accurate block techniques must define the specific muscular layers of the abdominal wall. The only way to facilitate this is to use loss of resistance techniques that define fascial layers. Initially, the anterior superior iliac spine is palpated and a mark made 2 cm medial and 2 cm superior from it (Figure 2). After skin preparation and infiltration with local anesthetic, a small puncture is made in the skin with a sharp needle to allow subsequent insertion of a blunt needle. The needle is inserted through the skin puncture site perpendicular to the skin. Increased resistance is met as the needle encounters the external oblique muscle. A loss of resistance is appreciated as the needle passes through the muscle to lie between it and the internal oblique. After the initial loss of resistance and negative needle aspiration for blood, 2 mL of local anesthetic are injected. The needle is then inserted farther to encounter another resistance, which is the internal oblique muscle.
A further loss of resistance is appreciated once the needle passes through the internal oblique to lie between it and the transversus abdominus muscle. After the second loss of resistance, another 2 mL of local anesthetic are administered. The needle is then withdrawn to skin and redirected at a 45-degree angle medially to again pierce the external and then the internal obliquemuscles (Figure 3). After each loss of resistance, 2 mL of local anesthetic are again administered. The needle is then returned to skin and inserted 45 degrees laterally, and the procedure is repeated. Thus, a total of 12 mL of local anesthetic is placed in a fan-like distribution between the external and internal oblique and the internal oblique and transversus abdominus muscles. Note: In patients with little abdominal wall musculature, the internal oblique muscle may be too thin to appreciate a loss of resistance as it is penetrated. To prevent entering the abdomen (see Complications) after piercing the external oblique muscle, the author limits further abdominal wall penetration without loss of resistance to 1.5 cm. After completion of the block, the skin of the lower abdominal wall or inguinal region is tested for anesthesia.
Equipment
Indications and Contraindications
Indications for ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blocks include anesthesia for any somatic procedure involving the lower abdominal wall/inguinal region such as inguinal herniorrhaphy[2-5] and for analgesia after surgical procedures using a Pfannenstiel incision as for cesarean section[7] and abdominal hysterectomy.8 These blocks do not provide visceral anesthesia and thus cannot be used as the sole anesthetic for procedures such as lower intraabdominal surgery.When used for inguinal herniorrhaphy, the sac (containing peritoneum) must be infiltrated with local anesthetic by the surgeon to complete anesthesia for the procedure. There are no specific contraindications for these blocks apart from the generic contraindications to performance of any regional block such as infection at the procedure site, allergy to local anesthetics, indeterminate neuropathy, and so on. choice of local anesthetic
Unless unusual circumstances occur requiring immediate anesthesia (thus requiring an intermediate-acting agent), a long-acting local anesthetic agent is used to provide the benefits of prolonged postoperative analgesia. We currently use ropivacaine in concentrations of 0.5–1% without adjuvants for ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blocks (less than 1% concentrations of bilateral block such as for Pfannenstiel incisions or bilateral herniorrhaphy are scheduled). For continuous infusions, ropivacaine in concentrations of 0.2–0.5% is used. complications and how to avoid them
Because proper performance of ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blocks requires multiple small volume injections the possibility of local anesthetic toxicity is remote. Pharmacokinetic studies of 3 mg/kg of 0.5% plain ropivacaine in children revealed peak plasma concentrations of ropivacaine well below the toxic level.9 A similar study in adults receiving 60–70 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine again revealed low peak plasma concentrations.10
Proper performance of ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blocks places the injection medial and superior to the anterior superior iliac spine. Some texts advocate performing the block from a point medial and inferior to the anterior superior iliac spine, which essentially places the injection within or inferior to the inguinal ligament. This may result in lateral femoral cutaneous or femoral block with little or no ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric anesthesia. However, even properly performed ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blocks can result in transient femoral anesthesia with a reported incidence of 3.7–5%.11,12 The mechanism of femoral anesthesia with these methods is tracking of local anesthetic along the fascia iliaca.13 In the event of femoral anesthesia associated with ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blocks, the surgeon is notified and the patient is advised to protect the lower extremity until the block recedes. Perforation of both the small[14] and large[15] bowels and creation of a pelvic hematoma[16] have been reported after ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blocks. This illustrates the importance of using blunt needles to appreciate the loss of resistance as the needle traverses the layers of the abdominal wall. As previously discussed, after piercing the external oblique muscle, limiting further abdominal wall penetration to 1.5 cm should prevent this complication. continuous ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Blocks
Prolonged postoperative analgesia for procedures using a Pfannenstiel incision has been successfully produced using bilateral catheters. Such catheters are an excellent alternative to epidural analgesia by allowing unlimited ambulation without the need for urinary catheterization. Control of visceral pain with NSAIDS or other agents is necessary to complete analgesia. Method
Summary
Regional anesthesia for surgical procedures involving the lower abdomen and inguinal region can be safely and successfully performed using ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric blocks. These techniques accord excellent postoperative analgesia, obviating the need for large-dose opioids and thus facilitating early ambulation and discharge. References
|
|
|
No part of this web page may be reproduced without the permission of the authors. DISCLAIMER: The material presented on this Web page has not been peer-reviewed. The indications, techniques and dosages on this Web page have been recommended in the medical literature and/or conform to OUR clinical practice. The medications and equipment have not necessarily been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in the techniques and dosages for which they are recommended. The package insert for each drug and/or equipment should be consulted for use and dosage as recommended by the FDA. Because standards, practices and recommendations change, it is advisable to keep abreast of revised recommendations, particularly those concerning new drugs and techniques. While the techniques and dosages described are successfully used in our practice, they should be followed with a discretion since their complications may be dependent on the operator, patient and/or other accompanying clinical circumstances. The development and maintenance of this web page has not been supported by any pharmaceutical or medical manufacturing industry. The medications and/or equipment discussed in the web page is shown solely for teaching purposes. Similar equipment or medications from other manufacturers may produce similar clinical results to ours. |