Nerve stimulation: Twitch of the quadriceps muscle at 0.5-1.0 mA current
Local anesthetic: 25-35 mL
General considerations
Continuous lumbar plexus blockade is an advanced regional anesthesia technique and adequate experience with the single-shot
technique is a prerequisite to ensure its efficacy and safety. Otherwise, the technique is quite similar to the single-shot
injection, except that the Tuohy-style tip needle is preferable. The needle opening should be directed cephalad to facilitate
threading of the catheter. This technique can be used for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing hip, femur, and
knee surgery.
A standard regional anesthesia tray is prepared with the following equipment:
Sterile towels and 4"x4" gauze packs
20-mL syringe with local anesthetic
Sterile gloves, marking pen, and surface electrode
One 1½" 25-gauge needle for skin infiltration
A 10-cm long, insulated stimulating needle (preferably Tuohy-style tip)
Catheter
Peripheral nerve stimulator
Landmarks
The landmarks for continuous lumbar plexus block are the same as in the single-shot technique:
Iliac crest
Midline (spinous processes)
Needle insertion site 4-cm lateral to the midline
Technique
The skin and subcutaneous tissues are anesthetized with local anesthetic. The needle is attached to the nerve
stimulator (1.5 mA, 2 Hz, 100 µsec) and to a syringe with local anesthetic. The palpating hand should be firmly
pressed and anchored against the paraspinal muscles to facilitate the needle insertion and redirection of the
needle when necessary (Fig. 20.14). A 10-cm, Tuohystyle tip, continuous block needle is inserted at a perpendicular
angle and advanced until the quadriceps twitch response is obtained at 0.5 to 1.0 mA current. At this point, the initial
volume of local anesthetic is injected (e.g., 15-25 mL) and the catheter is inserted approximately 8-10 cm beyond the
needle tip. The needle is then withdrawn back to the skin level, while the catheter is simultaneously advanced. This
method prevents inadvertent removal of the catheter.
Before administering local anesthetic, the catheter is checked for inadvertent intravascular and intrathecal placement by
negative aspiration test. The radiograph shows dispersion of the dye within the sheath of the psoas muscle.
TIPS:
It is useful to inject some local anesthetic intramuscularly to prevent pain on advancement of a larger gauge or blunt
tipped needles used for continuous block.
The opening of the needle tip should be oriented cephalad before threading the catheter.
The skin in the lumber area is very movable, thus insertion, of the catheter to a depth of 8-10 cm is necessary to
help prevent its removal during patient repositioning, etc.
Continuous infusion is always initiated after an initial bolus of dilute local anesthetic through the catheter. For this
purpose, we routinely use 0.2% ropivacaine (15-20 mL). Diluted bupivacaine or l-bupivacaine are also suitable, but
can result in more motor blockade. The infusion is maintained at 10 mL/hr or 5 mL/hr when a PCA dose is planned
(5 mL/q30 minutes). Figure 20.15 shows the dispersion of 20 mL of a contrast solution within the psoas sheath.
TIPS:
Breakthrough pain in patients on continuous infusion is always managed by administering a bolus of local anesthetic.
Simply increasing the rate of infusion is rarely adequate. With patients on the ward, a higher concentration of a
shorter acting local anesthetic (e.g., 1% mepivacaine) is useful to both manage the pain and test the position of the catheter.
When the bolus injection through the catheter fails to result in blockade after 30 minutes, the catheter should be
considered dislodged and it should be removed.
Every patient receiving lumbar plexus block infusion should be prescribed an alternative pain management protocol
because incomplete analgesia and catheter dislodgment can occur. For inpatients, this is probably best done using a
back-up IV PCA.
Goal
Visible or palpable twitches of the quadriceps muscle at 0.5-1.0 mA current.
TIPS:
Successful lumbar plexus blockade depends on the dispersion of the local anesthetic in the fascial plane (psoas muscle) where
the roots of the plexus are situated. Thus, the goal of the nerve stimulation is to identify this plane by eliciting stimulation
of one of the roots.
Stimulation at currents less than 0.5 mA should not be sought when using this technique. Dural sleeves thickly envelop the roots
of the lumbar plexus. Motor stimulation with a low current may indicate placement of the needle inside a dural sleeve. An
injection inside this sheath can result in tracking of the local anesthetic toward the epidural or subarachnoid space, with
consequent epidural or spinal anesthesia.
Failure to obtain quadriceps twitch on first needle pass
When insertion of the needle does not result in quadriceps muscle stimulation, the following maneuvers should be performed:
Withdraw the needle to the skin level, redirect 5º-10º cranially, and repeat the procedure.
Withdraw the needle to the skin level, redirect 5º-10º caudally, and repeat the procedure.
Withdraw the needle to the skin level, redirect 5º-10º medially, and repeat the procedure.
Withdraw the needle to the skin level and reinsert 2-cm caudally or cranially and repeat the procedure.
TIPS:
Failure to obtain a quadriceps muscle twitch on the first needle insertion is common, even with proper needle placement,
simply because the needle tip may pass between the two roots and thus stimulation is not obtained.
Using a higher stimulating current (e.g., 4 mA) to decrease the chance of missing the roots is only marginally beneficial.
In addition, there is a drawback that such stimulation is very uncomfortable for the patient (burning) and much deeper
sedation/analgesia is required.
Some common responses to nerve stimulation and the course of action to take to obtain the proper response:
Response Obtained
Interpretation
Problem
Action
Local twitch of the paraspinal muscle
Direct stimulation of the paraspinal nerve
Too shallow placement of the needle
Continue advancing the needle
Needle contacts bone at 4-6 cm depth; no twitches are seen
The needle advancement is stopped by the transverse process
This indicates proper needle placement, but requires redirection of the needle
Withdraw the needle to the skin level and redirect 5o cranially or caudally
Twitches of the hamstring muscles are seen; needle inserted 6-8 cm
This is the result of stimulation of the roots of the sciatic plexus (sciatic nerve)
The needle is inserted too caudally
Withdraw the needle and reinsert 3-5 cm cranially
Flexion of the thigh at the depth of > 6-8 cm
This subtle and often missed response is caused by direct stimulation of the psoas muscle
The needle is inserted too deep (missed the lumbar plexus roots); further advancement may place the needle intraperitoneally
Stop advancing the needle; withdraw the needle and reinsert using the protocol outlined in the technique description
The needle is placed deep (10 cm) but twitches were not elicited and bone is not contacted
The needle missed the transverse process and roots of the lumbar plexus
Too deep placement of the needle
Withdraw the needle and reinsert using the protocol outlined in the technique description
Brown DL, Bridenbaugh LD: The Upper Extremity. Somatic Block . In Cousins, M.J., and Bridenbaugh PO (eds): Neuronal Blockade in Clinical Anesthesia and Management of Pain. Philadelphia, J.B. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1988, pp 345-71.
Capdevila X, Macaire P, Dadure C, Choquet O, Biboulet P, Ryckwaert Y, D'Athis F: Continuous psoas compartment block for postoperative analgesia after total hip arthroplasty: new landmarks, technical guidelines, and clinical evaluation. Anesth Analg 2002; 94:1606-13.
Chelly JE, Casati A, Fanelli G: Continuous peripheral nerve block techniques. An illustrated guide. London, Mosby International Limited, 2001.
Farny J, Girard M, Drolet P: Posterior approach to the lumbar plexus combined with a sciatic nerve block using lidocaine. Can J Anaesth 1994; 41:486-91.
Farny J, Drolet P, Girard M: Anatomy of the posterior approach to the lumbar plexus block. Can J Anaesth 1994; 41:480-5.
Hanna MH, Peat SJ, D'Costa F: Lumbar plexus block: an anatomical study. Anaesthesia 1993; 48:675.
Kirchmair L, Entner T, Wissel J, Moriggl B, Kapral S, Mitterschiffthaler G: A study of the paravertebral anatomy for ultrasound-guided posterior lumbar plexus block. Anesth Analg 2001; 93:477
Lang S: Posterior lumbar plexus block. Can J Anaesth 1994; 41:1238.
Mansour NY, Bennetts FE: An observational study of combined continuous lumbar plexus and single-shot sciatic nerve blocks for post-knee surgery analgesia. Reg Anesth 1996; 21:287.
Pandin PC, Vandesteene A, d'Hollander AA: Lumbar plexus posterior approach: a catheter placement description using electrical nerve stimulation. Anesth Analg 2002; 95:1428.
Stevens RD, Van Gessel E, Flory N, Fournier R, Gamulin Z: Lumbar plexus block reduces pain and blood loss associated with total hip arthroplasty. Anesthesiology 2000; 93:115.
Vaghadia H, Kapnoudhis P, Jenkins LC, Taylor D: Continuous lumbosacral block using a Tuohy needle and catheter technique. Can J Anaesth 1992; 39:75.
Vloka JD, Hadzic A. Obturator and Genitofemoral nerve Blocks. Techniques In Regional Anesthesia and Pain Management 1999:3; 28-32.
DISCLAIMER:
The material presented on this Web page has not been peer-reviewed. The indications,
techniques and dosages on this Web page have been recommended in the medical literature
and/or conform to OUR clinical practice. The medications and equipment have not
necessarily been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in the
techniques and dosages for which they are recommended. The package insert for each drug
and/or equipment should be consulted for use and dosage as recommended by the FDA. Because
standards, practices and recommendations change, it is advisable to keep abreast of
revised recommendations, particularly those concerning new drugs and techniques. While
the techniques and dosages described are successfully used in our practice, they
should be followed with a discretion since their complications may be dependent on
the operator, patient and/or other accompanying clinical circumstances. The development
and maintenance of this web page has not been supported by any pharmaceutical or medical
manufacturing industry. The medications and/or equipment discussed in the web page is
shown solely for teaching purposes. Similar equipment or medications from other
manufacturers may produce similar clinical results to ours.