Peripheral Nerve Stimulator For Unassisted Nerve Blockade

Background

Introduction of peripheral nerve stimulators (PNS) in the practice of regional anesthesia caused a debate as to whether there were any advantages to their use over the paresthesia technique. One obvious advantage is that PNS causes minimal discomfort to patients, since the low stimulating currents (0.1 to 2.0 mA) stimulate larger A-alpha motor fibers rather than C-pain fibers. This is in contrast to the paresthesia technique which, by its nature, causes varying degrees of discomfort. Another advantage of PNS is that patient cooperation is not needed during the procedure and the block can be performed in an anesthetized patient. The incidence of nerve damage may also be decreased compared to the paresthesia technique. The success rate with the use of PNS is equal to, or greater than, the use of paresthesia. Besides the initial cost of the stimulator and the expense for the insulated needles, a frequently cited disadvantage associated with the use of the nerve stimulator is theneed for an additional person. Because PNS usually requires frequent changes in the intensity of the stimulating current during needle advancement toward the nerve, and a sterile technique is priority for most anesthesiologists, use of PNS generally requires an extra person to manipulate the output current. While in a teaching institution this is usually not an important issue, in a busy private practice it may present a significant disadvantage, since most anesthetic practices do not have the luxury of involving an additional person in performing regional blockade. With this in mind, we invented a device with a foot pedal to control the current applied during the performance of the regional nerve blockade.

Image Image

Device Description

This invention is a combination of the "Dual Stim Plus" nerve stimulator, model NS-2CA, Life-Tech, Inc., Houston Texas, and a modified "KORG" two-channel volume pedal, model KVP-001. These two devices are electronically connected and tuned to result in smooth and precise current control by pressing on the foot pedal. The new unit controls the output current in infinite number of ranges using the foot controller (i.e., 0 mA to 0.5 mA, 0 mA to 1.5 mA, etc.), allowing more precise current delivery. When connected to a standard dummy load of kiloohms, and tested on the Sony "Tektronix" 314 oscilloscope, Tektronix Inc., Beverdon, OR, characteristics of the device were essentially identical to those of the original PNS. Control of the stimulating current by the foot enables independent, one-person performance of the nerve blockade. Since the foot controller is detachable, the same unit can be used with or without its foot attachment. The invention has been approved for use on patients by our Biomedical Department at St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center (#S0012871), and has been successfully used in our clinical practice.

Image Image

References
  1. Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Device for Unassisted Nerve Blockade (US patent # 08/419,418).
  2. Hadzic A, Vloka JD. Peripheral Nerve Stimulator for Unassisted Nerve Blockade. Anesthesiology, 1996; 84(6): 1528-1529.

GO TO TOP

 

Site map

Acknowledgments



Valid XHTML 1.0!


COPYRIGHT © 1996, 2006 NYSORA.COM
No part of this web page may be reproduced without the permission of the authors.

DISCLAIMER: The material presented on this Web page has not been peer-reviewed. The indications, techniques and dosages on this Web page have been recommended in the medical literature and/or conform to OUR clinical practice. The medications and equipment have not necessarily been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in the techniques and dosages for which they are recommended. The package insert for each drug and/or equipment should be consulted for use and dosage as recommended by the FDA. Because standards, practices and recommendations change, it is advisable to keep abreast of revised recommendations, particularly those concerning new drugs and techniques. While the techniques and dosages described are successfully used in our practice, they should be followed with a discretion since their complications may be dependent on the operator, patient and/or other accompanying clinical circumstances. The development and maintenance of this web page has not been supported by any pharmaceutical or medical manufacturing industry. The medications and/or equipment discussed in the web page is shown solely for teaching purposes. Similar equipment or medications from other manufacturers may produce similar clinical results to ours.